Family Holiday Incurs £120 Fine as Teachers Deny Approval

A raging father has criticized the regulations of his son’s school after being refused permission to take him on a vacation.

Paul Hughes, a former member of the Armed Forces, expressed frustration as he faces a penalty for wanting to take his eldest child on a trip, while his youngest, who goes to a different school, was granted approval.

Paul, who works overseas for extended periods, emphasized his inability to freely schedule his holiday days due to his demanding job.

Schools and local authorities have the authority to charge parents fines of up to £120 per parent for unauthorized absences, with potential consequences including a three-month prison sentence if the fines remain unpaid.

Despite his son’s excellent school attendance and academic performance, Paul and his wife are confronted with potential fines from Mortimer Community College for wanting to spend quality time with their family.

Paul, based in South Shields, raised concerns about the fairness of allowing headteachers to dictate which students can take time off, especially in cases like his where work commitments abroad limit his availability.

He suggested that his son could make up for missed schoolwork at home, proposing a compromise to the school’s policy.

The current system grants headteachers the discretion to determine the number of days a student can be absent if leave is granted, requiring parents to seek approval beforehand.

Paul’s children, aged 10 and 15, maintain similar attendance records and are preparing for upcoming exams.

Expressing his discontent with the existing policies, Paul advocated for more flexibility, particularly for parents like himself who work away from home and cherish the limited time spent with their children.

He reminisced about a grace period during his school years that allowed for a two-week annual absence without repercussions, contrasting it with the stricter approach enforced today.

In response to the school’s decision to deny his request for a family trip to Normandy, Paul highlighted the irony of being fined for personal holidays while the school organizes excursions like skiing trips and overseas visits.

Paul questioned the disparity in treatment between parental and school-led absences, emphasizing the need for a more equitable approach to term-time vacations.

While acknowledging the challenges faced by teachers, Paul underscored the importance of parental involvement in deciding when to prioritize family time.

Mortimer Community College stated that they adhere to the Department of Education’s guidelines on authorizing absences, emphasizing the legal constraints that limit exceptions for term-time vacations.

As fines for unexcused absences are set to increase, parents like Paul find themselves at odds with the rigid enforcement of school attendance policies, prompting a broader discussion on parental rights and educational priorities.